If someone’s telling you to “use LSI keywords,” they’re giving you a relic, not a roadmap.
It’s advice from a time when SEO was driven more by superstition than substance. Back then, ranking meant stuffing your article with synonyms scraped from some keyword tool and hoping it tricked the algorithm into thinking your page was “relevant.”
But we’re not in 2010 anymore.
Today, Google’s understanding of language is light-years ahead. Its algorithms don’t just look for repeated terms — they look for depth, context, clarity, and intent. That means content doesn’t win by checking boxes. It wins by covering a topic intelligently, thoroughly, and with purpose.
“LSI,” or Latent Semantic Indexing, refers to a decades‑old algorithm used for textual analysis in an era long before modern SEO. It’s not used by Google today.
In fact, John Mueller—a trusted Google source—has stated bluntly: “There’s no such thing as LSI keywords.
What you probably hear as “LSI keywords” is still valuable—but misnamed. What really matters is semantic relevance: including contextually connected terms naturally as you deeply cover a topic.
SEO pages cautioning you to insert related words X number of times force content into checkbox-driven, unnatural form. This mindset leads to:
Robotic language,
Keyword stuffing or irrelevant inclusion,
Content that serves an algorithm, not a reader.
A Reddit thread on SEO bluntly called the LSI strategy “bullsh*t”:
“If you hire a smart writer who knows their shit, they’ll write a relevant article … LSI keywords are just dumb math trying to approximate something writers do naturally.”
Instead of chasing lists of “helpful words,” experts focus on coverage of context and depth of insight. Here’s how that plays out:
Competitive research reveals not just keywords, but subtopics competitors neglect.
Your job? Cover those gaps with thoughtful, original, high-value content.
Google’s AI and NLP systems understand content by building meaning from context—not by counting words.
Analyze top SERP pages and ask: are they informational, commercial, or supporting DIY users? Intent shapes structure—not LSI tools.
Map out which subtopics should appear—this naturally includes related terms like LSI—but it’s not the driver.
Focus on value-first writing. You’ll naturally include synonyms, semantically relevant phrases, and true depth without thinking about lists.
When your content genuinely covers a topic, Google often ranks for related terms—even those you didn’t explicitly include.
You write for metrics, not meaning.
You confuse form with substance.
You dilute user experience with irrelevant fillers.
At best, you’re producing content that might check all the boxes—but still fails to serve, engage, or convert.
Drop the buzzwords. Toss the myth. LSI keywords are a distraction. What matters is building content systems that:
Understand audience intent,
Cover topic comprehensively,
Deliver real value.
This mindset shifts content strategy from box-ticking to insight-driven authority. And that’s what wins traffic—and trust.
Book a call and let’s build content that aligns with intent, not outdated convention.